New York City Convention Host Committee Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
920869941
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
6465777601
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$9,850
Assets
$26,194
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL SIMON (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MICHAEL SIMON (PRESIDENT)
  • MICHAEL KROUSE (SECRETARY)
  • RAVI GUPTA (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support and advance social welfare to benefit the common good and general welfare of the community, including to promote tourism, growth in employment and public policy issues for the economic well-being of the citizens of the state of New York; to lessen the burden of government and promote economic growth, development and community improvement to the New York city region and New York state by encouraging and promoting New York city as the sight of a national convention.

What it reported doing in 2024

In order to bring great economic benefit to New York city, the committee organized prominent business leaders, politicians, and civic organizations to bring the democratic national convention to New York city in 2024. The committee highlighted New York's world-class infrastructure, iconic venues, and the city's historic significance to the democratic party. Although the 2024 convention was ultimately awarded to chicago, the committee remains committed to bringing the democratic national convention to New York city in 2028 and has already begun preparations for this future opportunity.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.66; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -150% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -33.2% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.