Maui Cancer Resources

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
320604289
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Pukalani, HI, USA
Phone
8088666155
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health Support Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$121,045
Expenses
$51,926
Assets
$154,365
Liabilities
$9,379

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRIDGET BONGAARD (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BRIDGET BONGAARD (PRESIDENT)
  • MARY DUNGANS (TREASURER)
  • MARSEAU SIMPSON (VP/SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Cancer resources mission is to provide state-of-the-art medical, educational and supportive care for maui county cancer patients and their families to improve their outcomes and quality of life.

What it reported doing in 2025

Medical consults dr. Bridget bongaard, mcr's medical director and a board-certified internal medicine physician, provides comprehensive clinical navigation, wellness education, and both emotional and physical support directly to cancer patients. In 2025, dr. B delivered these services pro bono, with an estimated in-kind value of $113,850.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 45
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 80
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 30.4%; rating input score 30
  • Program expense ratio: 70.9%; rating input score 71

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 57.1%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.97; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 26.1% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 22.2% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 24.2% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 30.4% of revenue deployed · 70.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $37K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.