Indiana Construction Roundtable Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
473739386
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Indianapolis, IN, USA
Phone
3176862669
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Job Training

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,459,785
Expenses
$3,613,580
Assets
$2,425,951
Liabilities
$287,836

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHRIS PRICE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BART DOAN (VICE CHAIR & DIRECTOR)
  • CHRIS PRICE (PRESIDENT)
  • ERIN DRAKE (SECRETARY & DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To educate the general public about employment opportunities for skilled construction craft professionals and the availability of skilled trades education, training, and job placement, and supportive human services and service organizational assistance in the Indiana construction industry; to raise funds from the public and other sources to further the purposes of the corporation, receive and maintain such funds, and expend principal and income therefrom in support of or in furtherance of the code section 501(c)(3) purposes of the corporation; to provide financial and other assistance to other organizations that are recognized as organizations exempt from federal income taxation within the meaning of code section 501(c)(3); and to assist and engage in all activities that serve other charitable and/or educational purposes, are permitted by applicable law, and are permitted to be carried on by an organization exempt from federal income taxation under code section 501(c)(3).

What it reported doing in 2025

Icrf adult programming by construction training courses teach basic safety, construction math, hand and power tools, construction drawings and communication skills. Adult learners earn up to four industry certifications, hear from industry professionals, and participate in a hiring fair at the conclusion of class. The program is offered in spanish as well as in corrections facilities. State of Indiana 2 year grant.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.4%; rating input score 70
  • Program expense ratio: 86.9%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: $37.54 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 90%; rating input score 90; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 19%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.67; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 22.1% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 23.7% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 70.4% of revenue deployed · 86.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 10 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $3M reported
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.