Greater Cincinnati Soccer League Inc Dba Cardinal Premier League Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
813105752
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2025
Location
Middletown, OH, USA
Phone
5135495811
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$168,133
Expenses
$99,383
Assets
$231,642
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Amber Hyman (Executive Director)
  • Steve Wood (President)

People named in this filing

  • Amber Hyman (Executive Director)
  • Ron Hughes (Boys Director)
  • Brian Berning (Girls Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the League shall be to teach and develop skills in the playing of soccer among youth 19 years of age and under, to promote the growth of competitive amateur soccer, and to encourage good sportsmanship and fair playing among the participants therein. To offer and participate with team programs in the programs of the United State Youth Soccer Association (US Youth Soccer) including sanctioned tournaments, State, Regional and National Championships. To participate in individual Olympic development programs offered by the Ohio Youth Soccer Association, Inc. (OSYSA) and the US Youth Soccer for the development of players for State, Regional and National teams and the development camps that will lead to player selection for teams to represent the United States in the Olympic, Pan American games and other National and International Competition.

What it reported doing in 2025

Cardinal Development League: Players age 7 & 8 developing their skills past recriation preparing them for a competitive environment.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 77
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 40.9%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.33; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.5%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 116.1% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 34.9% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.