Glenburn Home

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 351904684
IRS 990 coverage: 2016–2024
Forms available: Form 990 2024
Location: Linton, IN, USA
Phone: 8128472221
Rating: 72
Verdict: SUPPORTED
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Nursing, Convalescent Facilities

Reported finances

Revenue: $10,834,906
Expenses: $8,924,993
Assets: $13,474,085
Liabilities: $3,099,647

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

Dr Joe Trueblood (Vice President)
Sue Knoll (President)
Amy Gum (Executive Director)

Highest reported compensation

Amy Gum (Executive Director): $182,641 total reported compensation
Jean Johanningsmeier (Administrator): $165,456 total reported compensation
Amy Martindale (CFO): $116,415 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See Line 4a below

What it reported doing in 2024

Glenburn Home, Inc. operates a nursing facility with a total of 149 licensed beds all of which are licensed as skilled nursing beds. The facility provides long term nursing care to residents depending upon their needs - these services include room and board, nursing care, supplies, medications, therapies, meals, laundry and housekeeping services, activities and social services. The facility offers specialized services to elderly residents suffering from Alzheimers and dementia. Glenburn Home participates in the Medicare, Medicaid, Tri-Care, and/or other government sponsored health care programs as well as private managed care and other health care programs. Glenburn Home operates 28 independent living units offering additional assistance services and a Wellness Center for eldery citizens of Linton and surrounding areas in Indiana. The organization also provides meals on wheels to elderly residents of the community in and around Linton and Greene County Indiana.

Operating model

Revenue model: Earned-program. 71% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 69
Transparency & Controls: 70
Accountability: 77
Sustainability: 65
Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 70.8%; rating input score 71
Program expense ratio: 89.5%; rating input score 89
Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Limited
Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

Operating margin: 17.6%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.51; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 5.2%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 70.8% of revenue deployed · 89.5% of spending went to programs
Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8M in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $183K · 12 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.
Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.