Core Knowledge Charter School Parent Round Table Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311705617
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Verona, WI, USA
- Phone
- 6088454600
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $70,525
- Expenses
- $36,877
- Assets
- $94,322
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Alicia Naleid (Board of Directors - President)
- Jessica O'Shea (Board of Directors - Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Alicia Naleid (Board of Directors - President)
- Jessica O'Shea (Board of Directors - Vice President)
- Lindsey Zalhaka (Board of Directors - VP of Fund)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Core Knowledge Charter School Parent Round Table, Inc. is a volunteer parent organization that builds community among students, parents and staff, raises funds to complement the district-provided budget, and allocates those funds in the best interests of students and staff.
What it reported doing in 2025
Curriculum and Classroom Resource Grants -Grants to Verona Area Core Knowledge Charter School to purchase curriculum materials, classroom supplies, ebooks, and IXL instructional software licenses. Funding included the Reading Mastery reading curriculum, financed substantially by parent donations directed to that purpose. These grants supplemented the district-provided budget and benefited the approximately 370 students enrolled at the school during the academic year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 87% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 52.6%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 98.3%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 47.7%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.56; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 52.6% of revenue deployed · 98.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $36K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.