Contoocook Valley Education Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
364749683
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Antrim, NH, USA
Phone
6036201114
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Mutual/Membership Benefit N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$63,429
Expenses
$64,856
Assets
$24,416
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Victoria Burnham (President)
  • Gregory Leonard (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Victoria Burnham (President)
  • Gregory Leonard (Vice President)
  • Amanda Perry (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary exempt purpose of the ConVal Education Association (CVEA) is to promote and protect members' interests through activities including collective bargaining, representation, legal and public relations, and ensuring implementation of negotiated contracts and agreements while promoting the advancement of education and improvement of instructional opportunities for all.

What it reported doing in 2025

Collective Bargaining and Member Protection/Representation-Salaries and benefits negotiated with the Contoocook Valley School District for all employees categorized under the collective bargaining agreement, approximately 300 individuals. The CVEA protected, promoted and enforced implementation of the current collective bargaining agreement and provided guidance, support, and legal representation as necessary to CVEA members (approximately 150 individuals) in cases of contractual disagreements and other personnel matters, relating to things such as working conditions, discipline, and wages.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 90% of its reported program spending for member benefits.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 94
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.1%; rating input score 95
  • Program expense ratio: 93%; rating input score 93

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.2%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.4%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -45.9% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -48.2% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 95.1% of revenue deployed · 93% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $60K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.