Community Mediation & Restorative Servic
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411484089
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- New Hope, MN, USA
- Phone
- 7635610033
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Dispute Resolution, Mediation Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,338,617
- Expenses
- $1,103,297
- Assets
- $1,104,295
- Liabilities
- $53,807
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CECILIA STANTON ADAMS (PRESIDENT)
- MICHELE WALLACE (VICE PRESIDENT)
- BETH BAILEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- BETH BAILEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $164,009 total reported compensation
- NANCY RIESTENBERG (DIRECTOR): $10,031 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To develop the capacity of our community to respectfully resolve conflict and repair harm.
What it reported doing in 2025
Housing servicescommunity mediation & restorative services provides a variety of housing stability mediation and navigation services, working to improve housing stability in our local communities. Lifting up the collective wisdom of over 20,000 renter-owner meditations, cmrs is strategically moving services upstream and collaboratively addressing the resource runaround by increasing collaboration among resource providers - integrating financial, legal, and mediation resources. Cmrs had 331 housing resource navigation cases in 2025.see schedule o for addtional program language.with a multilingual team of housing navigators - including ampact americorps members - and trained mediators serving in the community and court, cmrs is helping renters to identify the resources needed to improve their situations and help connect them with their property owners to communicate and create pathways forward. Youth servicescmrs youth services are grounded in the belief that all youth are worthy, capable, and relational. We work with schools to increase their community's capacity to build community and repair harm. Using the circle process, based on indigenous ways of being, we work with youth and schools to hold spaces and conversations where youth can participate in a way that works for them and respond to conflict and harm. We also work with juvenile court, the hennepin county attorney's office, and law enforcement to divert youth from the justice system to community-based processes designed to merge support and accountability. Building on our work to create restorative schools, cmrs trains staff in how to implement restorative practices and culture in their work with youth. Cmrs provided 132 restorative services in 2025. Cmrs partnered with 3 schools, 2 school districts, juvenile court, and hennepin county police department.court and community mediation services and restorative practicesgrounded in the belief that people can resolve their own conflicts, cmrs works with court partners to allow disputants to co-create their agreements. We provide mediation services at all stages of disputes - before a court filing, during a court hearing, and following a court hearing. Cmrs mediators are in housing and harassment courts and help people involved in family, conciliation, probate, and district court disputes. Cmrs also provides community-based mediation and restorative services, helping people have difficult and constructive conversations. Through mediation, participants can hear and be heard and co-create agreements that fit their unique circumstances. Through restorative practices, participants build community and repair harm. Services address situations involving neighbors, families, workplaces, businesses, and customers, and organizations. Cmrs also facilitates large group conversations and spearheads community collaborations, building bridges across sectors.cmrs helped disputants create their own resolution through 165 mediation sessions in 2025. Cmrs handled a total of 736 mediation and navigation cases in 2025. Cmrs serves as an organizational mentor or fiscal sponsor - supporting mission-aligned work of geographically or culturally specific organizations and providing leadership in creating statewide access to services through community mediation Minnesota. Specifically, cmrs serves as the fiscal sponsor of restorative and mediation practices (ramp), a community dispute resolution program in southeast Minnesota. Social work, criminal justice and law degrees.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 68% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 64
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.1%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 93.3%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: $53.63 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 86.7%; rating input score 87; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.6%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15.8%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.8% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.1% of revenue deployed · 93.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $164K · 15 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 28 of 30 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.