C26 Ytri Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
991542239
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Fort Wayne, IN, USA
Phone
2604022490
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Sports Associations &Training Facilities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,089
Expenses
$9,710
Assets
$10,656

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RUTH STONE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • RUTH STONE (PRESIDENT)
  • MEGAN CHANDLER (VICE PRESIDE)
  • MAGGIE RODNEY (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

As a dedicated nonprofit organization, were on a mission to empower youth to strengthen their physical performance and mental fitness so they can enjoy a happy, healthy, and high-performing life.

What it reported doing in 2025

C26 youth triathlon ignites the spark of possibility in every young athlete. Recognizing the struggles that youth face in maintaining their mental and physical health, c26 youth triathlon is committed to being part of the solution. We're on a mission to empower youth to strengthen their physical performance and mental fitness so they can enjoy a happy, healthy, and high-performing life. To accomplish this, we host educational sessions and triathlon races for youth ages 3 to 12. In 2025 c26 ytri welcomed 115 young athletes, which is an incredible growth rate of 35% from 2024 enrollment.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 49
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 35.8%; rating input score 36
  • Program expense ratio: 70.4%; rating input score 70

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 49.1%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.1; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 25% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 97.3% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 157.2% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 35.8% of revenue deployed · 70.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 36/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.