Building Electrification Accelerator Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
994646270
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Arlington, MA, USA
Phone
7817184319
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Energy Resources Conservation and Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$177,956
Expenses
$107,482
Assets
$82,111
Liabilities
$11,637

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANIA CAMARGO (BOD PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARK DYEN (STEERING TEAM)
  • STEVEN E MILLER (MOVEMENT VOTER PROJECT)
  • ANIA CAMARGO (BOD PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The building electrification accelerator is a nonprofit, no-cost network with the mission of accelerating equitable building decarbonization in Massachusetts via municipal action. Bea network participants seek to advance the design, implementation, and replication of equity-focused local building electrification policies and programs. The bea supports local efforts by connecting participants with resources, model programs, funding, and one another.

What it reported doing in 2025

The building electrification accelerator (bea) operates a single integrated program to accelerate equitable building electrification across Massachusetts by supporting local leaders and advancing statewide progress. Bea convenes and supports municipal staff, community-based organizations, and local advocates through working groups, monthly meetings, and peer-learning networks, connecting them to resources, technical assistance, and one another. The bea provides direct support to local leaders, including research and program design support, to help move electrification projects forward, with a priority focus on historically underserved communities. The bea also produces a regular newsletter and other resources on electrification policy, funding, and best practices.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 64% of its reported program spending for member benefits.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 43
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 34.5%; rating input score 35
  • Program expense ratio: 57.1%; rating input score 57

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 39.6%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.76; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 29.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 34.5% of revenue deployed · 57.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $61K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 35/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.