Brother 2 Brother A 501C3 Charitable Organization

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
364446258
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Algonquin, IL, USA
Rating
52
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,134
Expenses
$4,770
Assets
$12,397

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • VINCENT MOSES (PRESIDENT AND BOD MEMBER)
  • JEFF MLINARICH (VICE PRESIDENT AND BOD MEMBER)

People named in this filing

  • VINCENT MOSES (PRESIDENT AND BOD MEMBER)
  • JEFF MLINARICH (VICE PRESIDENT AND BOD MEMBER)
  • JAY KRIPTON (TREASURER CFO AND BOD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

BROTHER 2 BROTHER is a Not-For-Profit 501c3 organization dedicated to community outreach and changing lives. Over the past 22 years our partners sponsors and friends have helped us towards achieving financial goals to fund projects in these categories: Feed My Starving Children ALS Foundation Created For More Ministries X-Factor Youth Program Voice of Care Special Needs Disability Back to School Book Bag Support Thanksgiving Food Drive PADS Housing Forward The Joshua Mission Bullied Kids Program. Making a Difference Since 2000 Brother 2 Brother has offered a helping hand anywhere and everywhere they see a need. B2B operates under four key principles. Under these principles Brother 2 Brother has been able to cast its footprint in many different places to help many different people. Brother 2 Brother just wants to make a difference.

What it reported doing in 2024

Pacific Garden Mission - Provided funds to support their mission to minister to homeless men women and children with the life-changing message of the Gospel.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 86% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 29
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 17.5%; rating input score 18
  • Program expense ratio: 48.2%; rating input score 48

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 63.7%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.6; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 17.5% of revenue deployed · 48.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.