Baltimore Underground Science Space Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 460738285
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Baltimore, MD, USA
- Phone
- 4434528498
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Specialized Education Institutions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $177,995
- Expenses
- $195,616
- Assets
- $103,910
- Liabilities
- $56,130
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Thomas Burkett (president)
- Lisa Scheifele (executive director)
Highest reported compensation
- Joel Tyson (director): $11,389 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See page 1, Part I, 1.
What it reported doing in 2025
COMMUNITY AND INDIVIDUAL MEMBER PROJECTS: BUGSS occupies a unique niche in the Baltimore ecosystem by enabling people of all backgrounds to engage with sophisticated scientific research in a safe, supportive and collaborative space. We provide lab space, rigorous lab-safety training and oversight, procurement support and scientific guidance. BUGSS brings together people of diverse backgrounds, from hobbyists pursuing projects of personal interest to those working at the intersection of art and science, who are using living organisms as artistic collaborators, to new biotechnology companies, who are at the earliest stages of inception. By year-end, BUGSS had 29 individual members including eighteen student members. Several members pursued independent research on microbiology, plant biotechnology and cancer detection, and several prior members successfully transitioned from working in the BUGSS lab to working at larger bioincubator spaces as their companies grew and became more well established. This year, we focused on developing a more robust safety-training program that could accommodate members whenever they chose to join the lab and that could provide faster approval for their use of new chemicals and biological reagents. This focus has helped us to expand our capacity and professionalism. BUGSS continued to support two member projects. Open Insulin is a long-standing project in collaboration with Open Insulin Foundation. It met twice weekly to engineer yeast cells to express a long-acting form of the insulin protein, and our focus this year was to increase the level of protein produced to make a production strain that could be viable for small-scale manufacturing. BUGSS also collaborated with the NASA STELLA program to develop a low-cost fluorometer that would detect fluorescence from a biological sample. Because fluorescent molecules are often used as readouts of biological reactions, this instrument could help to democratize expensive biological instrumentation to make scientific research and education more accessible.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66.6%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 60.6%; rating input score 61
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.9%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.54; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.8%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.6% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 66.6% of revenue deployed · 60.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $118K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $11K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 42 of 42 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.