Arleigh Acres Homeowners Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
841033317
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2009
Location
Berthoud, CO, USA
Phone
9703080184
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,232
Expenses
$10,922
Assets
$24,792
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ladon Kee (President)
  • Bill Ludwig (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Ladon Kee (President)
  • Bill Ludwig (Vice President)
  • Mary Fischbeck (Secretary/Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To carry out the provisions set forth in the Protective Covenants as registered in Larimer County, Colorado dated 13 April 1979. 1. Maintaining, distributing and administering irrigation water owned by the association. 2. Maintaining the roads in Arleigh Acres Subdivision. 3. Maintaining, administering and enforcing the covenants and restrictions.

What it reported doing in 2025

What is the organization's primary exempt purpose: To carry out the provisions set forth in the Protective Covenants as registered in Larimer County, CO dated 4/13/1979. 1. Maintaining, distributing and administering irrigation water owned by the association. The association owns 18 shares of irrigation water and has the responsibility to maintain the irrigation ditches and assure the safe flow of water through the subdivision to the homeowners. This service benefits all homeowners within the association. Grants: 0 Expense: $1548.00 2. Maintaining the roads in Arleigh Acres Subdivision. The association oversees and finances the general repair and upkeep of the Arleigh Acres Subdivision roads and the signage, as the State county will not/does not maintain the roads. The association is also responsible for maintaining the road drainage. This service benefits all homeowners within the association. Grants: 0 Expense: $8700.00 3. Maintaining, administering and enforcing the covenants and restrictions. The association maintains, administers and enforces the covenants and restrictions and collects and distributes the assessments and charges. The association is responsible for other common element maintenance provisions. This service benefits all homeowners within the association. Grants: 0 Expense: 674.00 4. Total Expenses: 10922.00

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -75.3%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.27; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.