The Albuquerque Chapter of the Military Officers Association of America
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850271222
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Phone
- 5058508121
- Rating
- 37
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $107,555
- Expenses
- $89,151
- Assets
- $156,255
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Stacey Goldstein-Dwyer (President)
- Walter Paul (President Ex-Officio)
People named in this filing
- Stacey Goldstein-Dwyer (President)
- Regner Rider (1st VP-Programs)
- R Tom Dawe (2nd VP-Programs)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote the purposes and objectives of the Military Officers Association of America; provide relief to the poor, distressed and/or underprivileged veterans; enhance the morale and protect the rights and interests of the members of the uniformed services, their dependents and survivors; provide useful services for members, their dependents and survivors; advance military education and science that benefit the nation and support veterans' memorials and monuments.
What it reported doing in 2025
The Albuquerque Chapter of the Military Officers Association of America (ALBUMOAA, or Chapter) is a member of the NM Military/Veterans Leadership Council (MVLC) which solely concentrates on state legislative issues: current issues include making the Retiree Tax Exemption permanent, Increasing the Veterans Property Tax Exemption & Initiatives to address Veterans Homelessness. As part of this Council, we meet throughout the year with state legislators, testify in front of both the Interim House/Senate Veterans Affairs Committees and regular Committees during the session. Together, we raised and donated more money than ever before, strengthened our advocacy and educational efforts, and-most importantly-enjoyed the camaraderie and connection of one another. Our collective dedication truly made a difference. We continued to support our military members and their families through partnering with local ROTC programs to provide mentorship to students both before and after graduation; hosting a birthday party for our members of age 90 or more; holding a memorial for our Fallen; and garage sales to boost our giving program. We also expanded our outreach through our Facebook page and our website to recruit new members and share chapter events; continuing our legislative advocacy; and volunteering at community events throughout the area. The Chapter has an excellent giving program. For 2025: ROTC Awards (3 College Juniors) $1,500; Blue Star Mothers - Rio Grande Chapter $1,500; Blue Star Mothers - Valencia Chapter $1,500; NM Veterans Integration Center (VIC) $3,000; Fisher House $750; Paws and Stripes $1,000; AFSA $100, and; Honor Flight of Northern NM $1,500. The Chapter provides JROTC Medals to 18 local high schools and ROTC Medals to three UNM programs; members of the Chapter personally do the presentation. The Chapter has a quarterly Social for members with presenters from the community. The Chapter participated in Wreaths Across America. The Chapter has 2 other activities open to members: Luncheon Club (quarterly with speaker); and Ski Club (4-5 ski trips per year).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.1%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.75; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.