Turning Point Endowment Inc
Overview
Mission
Turning point endowment is a supporting organization to turning point USA. The organization's mission is to support and benefit turning point USA's charitable purposes and long-term vitality.
What it reported doing in 2024
Turning point endowment is a supporting organization to turning point USA ("tpusa"), which is a 501(c)(3) entity with a mission to educate students about the importance of fiscal responsibility, free markets, and capitalism. The organization supports tpusa through contributions and by maintaining investments to support tpusa's long-term vitality.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Affiliate-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 821225311
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Phone
- 8448721776
- Rating
- 55
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Financial Counseling
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,287,186
- Expenses
- $533,297
- Assets
- $80,982,834
- Liabilities
- $54,652
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most filed governance safeguards are in place. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 23
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 81
- Sustainability: 95
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 9.3%; rating input score 9
- Program expense ratio: 54.2%; rating input score 54
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 89.9%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 151.85; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.2%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 28.3% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 9.3% of revenue deployed · 54.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $289K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $391K · 5 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 9 annual filings from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 9/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- CHARLIE KIRK (PRESIDENT): $390,637 total reported compensation
- JUSTIN OLSON (ASSISTANT TREASURER): $270,705 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024.