Georgia Tech Research Corporation
Overview
Mission
Georgia Tech Research Corporation (GTRC) and Georgia Tech Applied Research Corporation (GTARC) are 501(c)(3) organizations that support research at Georgia Tech by serving as contracting entities and providing financial support and stewardship of funds for sponsored research and research activities.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Georgia institute of technology research activity is supported by the Georgia tech research corporation which consists of over 2,000 individual projects for governments and industry. Payments and reimbursement of expenses and grants to and for the benefit of the Georgia institute of technology have been made. The Georgia tech research corporation is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of the Georgia institute of technology which is a unit of the university system in the state of Georgia.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 98% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 580603146
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Headquarters
- Atlanta, GA, United States
- Phone
- 404.894.4819
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 77
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.7%; rating input score 99
- Program expense ratio: 98.9%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 76.9%; rating input score 77; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.1%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.72; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.2%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 98.7% of revenue deployed · 98.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $501.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $651K · 32 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $488.4M reported
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 annual filings from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 10 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Leadership & pay
32 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- STEPHEN MCLAUGHLIN (TRUSTEE): $650,965 total reported compensation
- SHANTAY BOLTON (TRUSTEE): $564,359 total reported compensation
- RAGHUPATHY SIVAKUMAR (ASST SEC AND ASST. TREAS.): $491,872 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: FY2024.