Texas Health Action
Overview
Mission
Texas health action (tha) is a community-informed 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to providing access to culturally affirming, quality health services in a safe and supportive environment with an expertise in serving lgbtqia+ people and people impacted by HIV.
What it reported doing in 2023
Texas health action, through kind clinic, offers sexual health services such as prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted infections, as well as prevention and treatment of HIV. With a name and brand that represents knowledge, inclusion, nurture and dedication ("kind"), kind clinic strives to deliver measurable impact for its community by providing state-of-the-art sexual health services to all people, regardless of race, creed, gender, or sexual orientation, without judgment or stigma.waterloo counseling center has been a leading provider of affordable high-quality counseling services for austin and the surrounding area since 1983. Waterloo provides low cost counseling services, accepts many major forms of insurance, and is a place where everyone can receive mental health services in a culturally affirming and accepting environment. For more information about waterloo counseling center, please call 512-444-9922 or visit www.waterloocounseling.org.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473809253
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-N 2015
- Headquarters
- Austin, TX, USA
- Phone
- 5126511121
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 88.2%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.14 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.3%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.88; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.1%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 29.3% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 24.1% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 88.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $23.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $339K · 21 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $565K reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 8 annual filings from 2016 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- SANDRA GUERRA (CMO): $339,170 total reported compensation
- CHRISTOPHER HAMILTON (CEO): $272,252 total reported compensation
- CHRISTOPHER ADAMS (CFO): $234,212 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: FY2023.