Corporation for Battery Responsibility
Overview
Mission
Refer to form 990, part i, line 1
What it reported doing in 2018
Promoting sensible battery recycling
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 453957193
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2122972102
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $370,040
- Expenses
- $376,290
- Assets
- $182,906
- Liabilities
- $113,055
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 30
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 34.2%; rating input score 34
- Program expense ratio: 33.6%; rating input score 34
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.7%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.62; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -40.5% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -31.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -47.6% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 34.2% of revenue deployed · 33.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $126K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $139K reported
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 annual filings from 2015 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 34/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- MARC BOOLISH (PRESIDENT)
- STEVEN WICELINSKI (CHAIRMAN)
- CHARLES MONAHAN (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018.