Mothering Justice
Overview
Mission
Mothering justices mission is to organize a diverse leadership of mothers throughout Michigan to represent their collective interest.
What it reported doing in 2024
Through one-on-one conversations with moms across Michigan, mothering justice voulnteers to hear the issues facing families in and out of state. From lack of time off of work to take care of a sick family member, to the need for affordable health & child care, families - and mothers in particular - often feel like they are fighting an uphill battle alone. Mothering justice continues to work to educate law makers and the general public about these and other probelms as well as our proposed solutions. Continues on schedule o.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 72% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 453740989
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2014
- Headquarters
- Detroit, MI, USA
- Phone
- 3132101274
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 57
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.2%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 87.9%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $45.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 32.7%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.13; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.6%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 29.7% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 27.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 27.9% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 59.2% of revenue deployed · 87.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $166K · 7 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 8 annual filings from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- DANIELLE ATKINSON (EXECUTIVE DI): $165,771 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: FY2024.