Arts in Schools Collaborative
Overview
Mission
The mission of the program is to foster self-esteem, social awareness, mutual respect, teamwork, and joy in young people and their communities through social dance education and performance.
What it reported doing in 2025
Musicopia dance follows the standards-based curriculum of the dancing classrooms global program established in 1994 in New York city by four-time show dance world champion pierre dulaine and the american ballroom theater company, as seen in the award-winning documentary mad hot ballroom. The primary musicopia dance initiative is in-school residencies with professional artists who teach ballroom dances (rumba, swing, tango, foxtrot, waltz, and merengue), and non-competitive dances (heel-toe polka, the stomp, salsa, and the electric slide). Lessons take place during the school day in 45-minute sessions twice weekly for ten weeks. An entire fifth or eighth grade student body, and their classroom teachers, participate. Curriculum assignments occur throughout each residency, which connect the ballroom dance experience to the students personal and academic lives. Each residency concludes in a culminating public event where all students demonstrate the dances they learned. Select students go on to semifinal competitions. Winners of the semifinals participate in the colors of the rainbow team match final, with teams representing schools throughout the philadelphia region. The musicopia dance academy offers students who have experienced a dancing classrooms in-school residency the opportunity to advance their ballroom dance training on saturday mornings with professional teaching artists. Classes are held in fall and spring sessions at a location in philadelphia.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 450553704
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Headquarters
- Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Phone
- 2152683973
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts Education
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 13
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 99.6%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 93.1%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: $369.11 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 18.7%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 99.6% of revenue deployed · 93.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $171K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $158K · 21 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 annual filings from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- CATHERINE CHARLTON (PRESIDENT): $157,840 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: FY2025.