Deutsches Altenheim Inc

Overview

Mission

To provide the highest quality senior healthcare services to individuals of every religion, ethnicity, and background, while preserving the organization's german cultural heritage.we welcome individuals of every religion, ethnicity, and background, who may choose to benefit from our ability to offer the most advanced senior health care services in a german cultural environment.recognizing the diversity of individual needs and circumstances, we are committed to provide those services that will assist each individual to achieve and maintain his/her maximum level of dignity and independence.

What it reported doing in 2024

Deutsches altenheim skilled nursing facility: since 1914, deutsches altenheim has been recognized in the greater boston area as a resource for seniors in need. Starting as a retirement community focusing on senior care, deutsches altenheim has grown to provide countless seniors with a tremendous quality of life and today encompasses rehabilitation skilled services in the carl j. Ludwig transitional care unit (tcu). The tcu offers short term, skilled nursing rehabilitative care for patients who require services after a hospital stay before returning to the community. Deutsches altenheim also provides long-term skilled nursing care and has a state certified alzheimer/memory care unit.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
042104144
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Headquarters
West Roxbury, MA, USA
Phone
6173251230
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Group Homes

Official website

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.8%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 82.1%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $155.11 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.2%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.14; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.69; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.6%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.8% of revenue deployed · 82.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 18 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $20.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $926K · 27 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.4M reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 14 annual filings from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Leadership & pay

27 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • BARRY BERMAN (CHIEF PHILANTHROPY OF LEGACY LIFECARE MANAGEMENT): $925,530 total reported compensation
  • ADAM BERMAN (TRUSTEE, CEO OF LEGACY LIFECARE MANAGEMENT): $777,533 total reported compensation
  • ELIZABETH MULLEN (COO OF LEGACY LIFECARE MANAGEMENT): $321,438 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: FY2024.