Museum of Fine Arts
Overview
Mission
See schedule o.
What it reported doing in 2024
Operating support: expenses: $24,009,233 revenue: $0operating support consists of all other areas of the museum. Including protective services, facilities and other areas which support the operations of the museum and its mission.parking facilities: expenses: $1,304,091 revenue: $4,877,518the museum owns a parking garage and has two open-air parking lots. All of these facilities are open to members and visitors to the museum. The operation of adjacent parking lots by the museum, in areas of insufficient parking spaces for the use of its visitors, contributes importantly to the museum's exempt purpose by encouraging visitation and longer periods viewing of its collections, and special exhibitions. Any profits from the fee charged for the use of the lot is placed in the general operating fund.food services: expenses: $154,800 revenue: $1,914,669the museum is organized and operated as an art museum. The eating facilities which are contracted and managed by ra, are open to the museum staff, employees, and members of the public visiting the museum and are of a size commensurate with accommodation of these special groups of patrons.membership & visitors: expenses: $4,545,440 revenue: $10,994,317over 1,053,000 visitors attended the museum during fiscal year 2025. During the fiscal year 2025, there were more than five community days during which admission charges were waived. The museum has over 58,000 active member households. There are 8 levels of annual membership with fees ranging from $90 to $300. Each category offers a wide variety of privileges, such as free admission, publications, reciprocal member benefits at other major art museums around the u.s. And special events.other misc. Program services: expenses: $13,353,850 revenue: 7,877,518
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 042103607
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Boston, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6173693281
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Art Museums
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $186,630,042
- Expenses
- $141,309,618
- Assets
- $1,584,373,764
- Liabilities
- $158,367,343
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - Most voting board members are independent and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 61
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61.7%; rating input score 62
- Program expense ratio: 58.6%; rating input score 59
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.48 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 24.3%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.21; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.5%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61.7% of revenue deployed · 58.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 41 of 41 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $82.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.2M · 53 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $11.9M reported
- Consistency: 38 of 39 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 annual filings from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 48/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
Leadership & pay
53 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- MATTHEW TEITELBAUM (ANN & GRAHAM GUND DIRECTOR): $1,192,383 total reported compensation
- ERIC WOODS (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $556,599 total reported compensation
- CAMERAN MASON (CHIEF EXTERNAL RELATIONS): $514,799 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024.