Hopetoday
Overview
Mission
Provide assistance to the needy in vietnam and cambodia
What it reported doing in 2025
Provided help for flood victims in Nghe An, Thanh Hoa, Hue, Phu Yen, Binh Dinh, Khanh Son and Tay Nguyen. Provided food and medical help for the sick, the elderly and the poor in Sai Gon, Long An, Ben Tre, Thanh Hoa, Hue, Can Tho and leprosy villages in Pleiku and Gia Lai. Paved a road, built a bridge and provided food for poor villages in Ha Giang. Built houses for the poor in Ke Sach and Tay Nguyen. Provided scholarships and school materials to needy students in Cao Bang, Lang Son, Thai Binh, Thanh Hoa, Gia Lai, Kien Giang, Mo Cay, Hue and Ba Ria. Supported a charitable clinic in Hue. Provided clean water systems for the poor in Gia Lai and Southern Vietnam. Helped the orphans in Vung Tau. Made three trips to Vietnam to provide humanitarian relief in various regions of Vietnam.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330953830
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Fountain Valley, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9496772033
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $362,114
- Expenses
- $393,642
- Assets
- $209,239
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 0
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 99.8%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.7%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 12 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $393K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 12 of 13 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 annual filings from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grants require schedule f did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
People named in this filing
- GARY REUTER (Vice President)
- KHANH VO (Treasurer)
- PHONG NGUYEN (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025.