Crystal Cove Conservancy
Overview
Mission
To promote educational and interpretative activities of the California state park system at crystal cove state park, support scientific studies, continue restoration of the historic district buildings and presentation of these subjects to the public.
What it reported doing in 2024
Protect: crystal cove state park is part of an interconnected landscape. While the boundaries that define it are invisible to the plants and animals that live here, how we manage the land within those boundaries has impact far beyond its borders. The park is one of the last remaining undeveloped stretches along orange county's coastline and includes riparian and oak woodland habitats, as well as a rocky intertidal zone and a transient kelp forest in the offshore underwater park. These projected ecosystems are part of the larger south coast wilderness open space, which stretches to laguna coast wilderness park and city of irvine open space. Crystal cove state park is also designated as public conservation land on the orange county green vision map and is an enrolled property within the natural communities conservation plan/habitat conservation plan (nccp/hcp) for central coastal orange county. Crystal cove state park is a critically important place because it contains rare and endemic ecosystems that are not found in many other places on earth. Its backcountry is dominated by coastal sage scrub, a now-rare plant community whose range has been drastically reduced due to coastal development. Its bluffs, a rare island of protected natural space in a prime location for beachside homes and shopping centers, boast some of the last remaining coastal bluff scrub in orange county, including several extremely endangered species of rare plants. The park is also home to rare and endangered bird and animal species, including California gnatcatchers (a target species to conserve under orange county's natural communities conservation plan), coastal cactus wrens, orange-throated whiptail lizards, and the least bell's video. However, due to a long history of cattle grazing, much of the backcountry and coastal terraces have been converted into annual grasslands dominated by invasive plants such as black mustard. Besides damage done by ranching, the land is also being impacted by drought, climate change, and an ever-increasing number of daily visitors who worry they may be loving the park to death. These challenges are not unique crystal cove state park. The park is part of a larger, contiguous open space, and many areas across orange county and up and down the coast have been drastically affected by these same challenges. The land has been left with stressed native plants and depleted seed banks struggling against hotter, drier weather, making it difficult to rebound on its own without intensive management - but developing and assessing the strategies that would work best take a scientific tactic that state parks often doesn't have the resources to coordinate. Over the last year, the conservancy has stepped into a new role to support park's natural resources team in developing a systematic approach to identifying optimal restoration strategies which will undoubtedly help other land managers throughout the larger south coast wilderness open space and beyond.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 56% for direct work, and 44% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330878633
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Headquarters
- Newport Coast, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9494976302
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Parks and Playgrounds
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.5%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 77.6%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.82 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.54; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.4%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.5% of revenue deployed · 77.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $290K · 27 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 12 annual filings from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Leadership & pay
27 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- SHANNON KATE WHEELER (PRESIDENT/CEO): $289,559 total reported compensation
- HALLIE JONES (VICE PRESIDENT): $210,892 total reported compensation
- REX AUSTIN BARROW (CHIEF OF OPERATIONS (UNTIL 10/2024)): $207,618 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: FY2024.