Loma Linda University Health Care

Overview

Mission

Loma Linda University Health Care is organized to support the clinical teaching programs of Loma Linda University School of Medicine in conjunction with Loma Linda University and Loma Linda University Medical Center by providing medical and administrative supporting services; to establish, support, and maintain medical clinics providing health care services through its affiliation with Loma Linda University School of Medicine; to sponsor, advance, and promote health and medical education; and to engage in medically related research services through affiliation with the Loma Linda University School of Medicine.

What it reported doing in 2024

Loma Linda University Health Care (LLUHC) provides administrative and management services for medical clinics in conjunction with Loma Linda University School of Medicine and Loma Linda University Medical Center. LLUHC provided administrative support to over 1,100 faculty physicians responsible for training and educating approximately 695 medical students and 900 residents. This combination of care providers saw about 54,000 patients on a monthly basis. A significant number of these patients received medi-cal or medicare assistance.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 83% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 82% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
330364239
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Headquarters
Loma Linda, CA, USA
Phone
9095584138
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 92
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 78.5%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.7%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.51; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.54; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.8%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 76% of revenue deployed · 78.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $212.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 22 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $52.2M reported
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 annual filings from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • Angela Lalas (CFO 040118): $1,437,742 total reported compensation
  • Anthony Hilliard MD (Vice Chair 1024): $1,239,386 total reported compensation
  • Lyndon Edwards (Director): $1,174,871 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: FY2024.