Third Way Institute
Overview
Mission
Third way institute supports charitable and educational activities that advance centrist solutions to major economic, national security, energy and social policy issues.
What it reported doing in 2024
Third way institute supports the development of educational materials and events on the policy challenges faced by america, focusing on a wide variety of policy issues.climate and energyin 2024, third way's climate and energy program helped solidify the united states' position as a global leader in clean energy innovation and deployment. Third way focused their efforts on addressing deployment challenges, clarifying the economic and national security benefits of clean energy, and supporting strategies that accelerate progress. Third way's work centered on three priorities: 1) equipping decision-makers with data and insight to guide the energy transition; 2) identifying and addressing non-cost barriers to clean energy deployment; and 3) increasing public understanding of the benefits of clean energy.third way bridged gaps in the clean energy economy by providing strategic analysis and solutions.social policy and politicsin 2024, third way's social policy, education and politics team focused on three core areas: 1) defining what american want from Washington; 2) centering value in the higher education debate; and 3) addressing threats on social issues: defining what americans want from Washington: third way's politics team answered this question by: --utilizing electoral data sources including the catalist voter file, cooperative election study, and ap votecast, to draft reports analyzing and explaining the american electorate and differences in opinion, worldview, and voting behavior across states and districts with a focus on key presidential and senate states and battleground house districts; --conducting qualitative and quantitative public opinion research to better understand what voters prioritize, how they think about current issues under discussion in the administration and congress, and what they want from candidates and policymakers; --building a case against running a well-financed third-party candidate in the 2024 presidential election by employing historical and empirical data to show this candidate would have no path to victory and could only play a role as a spoiler for voters; and, --tracking how ideological divergent candidates fare in primary and general elections in 2024 to continue years of work showing americans continue to gravitate to mainstream candidates over extremism.centering value in the higher education debate: third way's education team continues to lead a coordinated movement to change the federal policy narrative on higher education from cost to return on investment and socialize a slate of actionable, defensible solutions to improve postsecondary value, quality, and accountability for students and taxpayers. Third way advanced these efforts by:--hosting the program's largest event to date, the higher ed value summit, a conference that brought together experts in the field, including former department of education under secretary james kvaal and other notable influencers, for a day of learning and connection on the biggest barriers to centering value in the industry.--conducting landmark public opinion research on high school students, demonstrating that young americans still see value in pursuing a college degree and understanding their barriers to that pursuit. --publishing the fourth annual economic mobility index, along with a dedicated website for our value metrics, to celebrate colleges and universities that open their doors to students from low-income backgrounds and prioritize their success.--championing the postsecondary student success grant program to support evidence-based college retention and completion programs and making the case for making this fund permanent.--weighing in on the formation of a new college accreditor and how they're developing their accrediting standards to hold them accountable to their role in the process of improving outcomes for students. --developing policy ideas for improving the graduate student lending system, which currently drives our high outstanding f
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 99% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 260535276
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Headquarters
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2023841700
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Research Institutes and Public Policy Analysis
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 99
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 99%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: $2,650.41 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -15.8%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.27; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.53; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.4%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.9% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.6% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $22.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $455K · 7 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 annual filings from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- JONATHAN COWAN (PRESIDENT): $454,588 total reported compensation
- MATTHEW BENNETT (SECRETARY): $420,593 total reported compensation
- STEVE J DIETERLE CFO (BOARD TREASURER): $188,420 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: FY2024.