CODAC Health, Recovery & Wellness

What it reported doing in 2024

Sacasa sexual assault servicesthe southern Arizona center against sexual assault (sacasa) provides confidential advocacy, treatment and referral services for all survivors of sexual assault, regardless of when victimization occurred. Sacasa is the county provider of 24/7 hospital response advocacy and medical forensic examinations (mfe) for adolescent and adult survivors of sexual assault and strangulation.advocates provide 24/7 services; english/spanish hotline and in-person services; information about victims' rights and victims' compensation; referral throughout the criminal justice/victims services process and to internal and community providers; accompaniment to emergency care and medical forensic exams (mfes), law enforcement and attorney/court meetings; connection with mental health services; and help solving other practical problems from the victimization. Advocates also provide trainings to the community.individual, couple, family, and group therapy are available for survivors and secondary survivors. Four therapy and support groups are offered each week. All staff are trained in sexual assault protocols, crisis de-escalation, coping skills, crisis response/dispatch, trauma-informed care, and information/referral provision. Sacasa's impact is strengthened through close collaboration with local, county and state law enforcement, the pima county attorney's office, the consulate, and nonprofit agencies such as emerge and the children's advocacy center.in fy25, sacasa served an average of 610 unique individuals each quarter. Sacasa met with 612 victims in hospital emergency rooms and provided 220 forensic exams following sexual assault. Therapists provided over 820 services and 116 therapy groups were provided at no cost through federal funding. Additional services were provided to victims who opted to use their health insurance. Sacasa's no-cost services are funded through local contracts and grants, federal grants, and private donations.

Financial Efficiency

• Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
• Program expense ratio: 95.7%; rating input score 96
• Fundraising efficiency: $105.71 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

• Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
• Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
  • Compensation committee: Missing
  • Independent consultant: Pass
  • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
  • Written employment contract: Pass
  • Compensation survey or study: Pass
  • Board or committee approval: Pass
• Foreign activity oversight: Limited
• Grant itemization coverage: Limited
• Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
• Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

• Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
• Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
  • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
  • Whistleblower policy: Pass
  • Document-retention policy: Pass
  • CEO compensation review process: Pass
  • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
  • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
  • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
  • Audit committee oversight: Pass
  • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

• Operating margin: -0.7%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
• Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.35; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
• Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
• Officer compensation ratio: 6.2%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

• Program expense growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
• Revenue growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
• Asset growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings