North Salem Bridle Trails Association
Overview
Mission
The promotion of the sport of trail riding, walking and cross country skiing.
What it reported doing in 2025
Maintenance of trails
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The nonprofit carried out 100% of its reported program work directly.
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237077837
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2024
- Headquarters
- North Salem, NY, USA
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and the filing reports that some governance safeguards are missing.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.5%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 81.7%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
- Public monitoring controls: Limited
- Public policy transparency: Limited
- Public financial transparency: Limited
- Impact reporting controls: Limited
- Public relationship transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Public governance controls: Limited
- Zakat policy transparency: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 32.3%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Operating reserve ratio: 4.02; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 59.5% of revenue deployed · 81.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $76K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 annual filings from 2010 to 2025