Resilient Cities and Communities

Overview

Mission

Resilient Cities and Communities (RCC) mobilizes over 2,000 local leaders to implement high-impact, hands-on environmental projects, including urban reforestation, energy efficiency improvements, and habitat restoration. By connecting volunteer teams with non-profit and government partners, the organization fosters neighborhood-level action to achieve regional resilience and climate goals.

What it reported doing in 2025

Urban Forestry and Community Greening - we partnered with 3 neighborhoods, the Minneapolis Health Department, MPRB and Birch Tree to organize tree education workshops and tree planting events with parents and kids working side by side with trained foresters to plant trees at child care centers, schools, parks and nonprofit affordable housing locations. We offered the tree education sessions in both English and Spanish to engage Latine community members to learn about the benefits of trees, how to correctly plant trees and care for them, how to manage tree pests and about opportunities for careers in Forestry. We're supporting 4 neighborhoods to increase their tree coverage from 15% up to 40% by ensuring that all new trees are planted correctly and are watered weekly for the first 3 years to get well established to provide benefits for decades to come. https://rccmn.co/trees Through our Growing Communities outreach with Hennepin County we engaged community members to help plan a new pollinator garden that is being developed on a vacant lot in an industrial area in Eden Prairies that is adjacent to a regional bike trail. RCC is partnering with Landbridge Ecological and Hennepin County to transform a formerly overgrown lot near 7690 Corporate Way in Eden Prairie into a native pollinator habitat. The project aims to restore biodiversity, with planting scheduled to follow invasive species removal, and will be maintained to create a sustainable ecosystem. https://eplocalnews.org/2025/05/22/from-blight-to-bloom-overgrown-lot-to-be-transformed-into-pollinator-garden/ Through this project RCC, Hennepin Co. Northern Gardener and Project Sweetie Pie hosted a Community Garden Leader's Fall Harvest Celebration that brought together 70 urban garden leaders and nonprofit, city and county partners to reflect on this growing season and plan what we wanted to work on over the winter to get ready for next summer. RCC and the MN State Horticultural Society are planning to Co-launch a city wide community garden leaders network in the spring of 2026 to organize garden hubs in South, SE, North and NE Minneapolis to distribute more seeds, plants, compost and mulch to support 50 community gardens to grow and share more fresh prorduce https://rccmn.co/gardens-food-pollinators/

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 73% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205001106
IRS 990 coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
Headquarters
Minneapolis, MN, USA
Phone
6122500389
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Environmental Beautification and Aesthetics

Official website

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 86
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 79.9%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: $3.59 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.6%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.16; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 74.1%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 60.6% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 67.6% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73% of revenue deployed · 79.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $184K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $88K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • Sean Gosiewski (Executive Director): $88,500 total reported compensation
  • Gladys Daniela Mejia (Program Director): $82,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: FY2025.