51-23 New York Graphic Communications

Overview

Mission

To perform union related activities to benefit the membership including negotiating for better wages, fringe benefits and working contidions- operating in a multi-employer environment

What it reported doing in 2011

Union related expenses in a multi-employer environment

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133877958
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2011
Forms available
Form 990 2011
Headquarters
New York, NY, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Labor Unions

The verdict

- This form does not report enough financial and governance detail to rate the organization. That is normal for this form and is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited
  • Public monitoring controls: Limited
  • Public policy transparency: Limited
  • Public financial transparency: Limited
  • Impact reporting controls: Limited
  • Public relationship transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
  • Public governance controls: Limited
  • Zakat policy transparency: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -39.6%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Operating reserve ratio: 4.98; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 19.6%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -18.3% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.7% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $239K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $146K · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 annual filings from 2010 to 2011
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.