Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Aajc Inc

Overview

Mission

The mission of asian americans advancing justice-aajc (aajc) is to advance civil and human rights for asian americans and to build and promote a fair and equitable society for all.

What it reported doing in 2024

Immigration and immigrant rights: aajc provides leadership, educates policymakers, stakeholders, and the media on immigration policy as it affects the asian american and pacific islander communities. Aajc advocates for fair and just immigration policies that protect family unity, provide access to immigration status and citizenship, and promote civil rights protections and due process in enforcement. Aajc also provides the asian american community with essential information, insight and analysis on newly enacted and proposed immigration and immigrant integration policies and programs. Aajc works to combat the government's racial targeting and profiling of asian american and asian immigrant scientists, researchers, and scholars, particularly those of chinese descent. Aajc leads federal advocacy efforts, including successful advocacy to end the department of justice's china initiative. Aajc also provides a legal referral service in english and mandarin chinese that connects people impacted by government profiling to attorneys and helps ensure they know their rights.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 49% for direct work, and 51% for grants.

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133619000
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2020
Headquarters
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2022962300
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Civil Rights

Official website

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 81.7%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $10.36 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.7%; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -26.4%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.51; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.8%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 19.5% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.7% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 25% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 81.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 10 filed program accomplishments · $13M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $383K · 27 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $814K reported
  • Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 10 annual filings from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 46 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 39 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Leadership & pay

27 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • GAYLE YAMADA (VP, DEVELOPMENT (UNTIL 10/24)): $382,758 total reported compensation
  • JOHN C YANG (PRESIDENT & EXEC. DIR.): $268,305 total reported compensation
  • LUCY LEE (VP, FINANCE & OPERATIONS): $253,105 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: FY2024.