The New York Academy of Medicine

Overview

Mission

Drive progress towards improved health through attaining health equity.

What it reported doing in 2024

The academy library - see schedule o.the academy library (https://www.nyam.org/library/) began operations in january 1847, as part of the newly established New York academy of medicine. In 1878 the library opened to the public, as it remains today. In the late 19th century, the library began collecting rare and historical works in medicine. Today the collections comprise over a million items: over 550,000 volumes of books and journals, including a rare book collection of approximately 32,000 volumes; 275,000 portraits and illustrations; approximately 400,000 pamphlets; and over 1,800 linear feet of manuscripts and archives. In 2012, the library restructured as an historical medical library. The library retains the medical literature it acquired over 175 years of service, and now focuses its collecting on rare and historical works in medicine and public health, as well as historical literature in those areas. It serves researchers with materials from our collections; supports two research fellowships, the audrey and william h. Helfand fellowship in the history of medicine and public health, and the paul klemperer fellowship in the history of medicine; provides visitors and classes with tours of the collections and the historic building; mounts historical programs; and shares its insights through social media and the library blog. On september 25, 2024, the academy library mounted a conference, "the future of historical medical libraries in the digital age." conceived as a follow-up to the december 2013 gathering at the college of physicians of philadelphia, "emerging roles for historical medical library: value in the digital age," the conference addressed issues of identity, technology, and organization, and was designed to be of interest to special collections libraries more generally. The conference featured 16 speakers, among them keynoter trevor owens, american institute of physics, "catching up to the digital present: a future for history of science, technology, and medicine collections, and jeremy a. Greene, johns hopkins university, "the future of the past in academic medicine: rethinking the historical role of the medical library." we saw over 250 attendees, about 100 in person and 175 virtually, with our newly avaible streaming set-up. Plans are underway to have the conference papers published. Further information about the conference is found at https://www.nyam.org/events/event/future-historical-medical-libraries-digital-age/. The library's 2024 programming (https://www.nyam.org/library/library-events-programs/) continued "color our collections," (http://library.nyam.org/colorourcollections/)february 59, mounting coloring books from 93 libraries, archives, museums, and cultural institutions from around the world. The library's own coloring book focused on "living well in the 19th and 20th centuries," reflecting the idea that good health is not simply the absence of disease. On june 18 we participated in the annual museum mile festival on fifth avenue, and on october 20, in open house New York weekend, offering tours of the academy building in connection with this city-wide architectural event. We offered ten drop-in, theme-based presentations of the collections on the first monday of each month at noon. The library's blog, "books, health, and history," (https://nyamcenterforhistory.org/) posted eleven articles in 2024, including posts on wheatless cake recipes, developed in response to grain shortages during world war i, blood donation, and, as part of the celebration of pride month, the library's collection of the ladder, published by the daughters of bilitis, a gay-forward organization of the 1950s and '60s. On april 18, 2024, in honor of earth day we screened "how to blow up a pipeline," an imaginative film that follows eight individuals who try to fight against a shared environmental enemy. After this film we hosted a discussion with briana carbajal, state legislative manager at we act for environmental justice.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
131656674
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2128227222
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Research Institutes and/or Public Policy Analysis

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,636,391
Expenses
$12,192,915
Assets
$64,435,637
Liabilities
$2,433,612

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 92
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.8%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 70%; rating input score 70
  • Fundraising efficiency: $3.73 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 91.9%; rating input score 92; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 95.5%; rating input score 95; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -14.6%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.28; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 21.6%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.9% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.8% of revenue deployed · 70% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 21 of 22 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $8.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $722K · 33 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.3M reported
  • Consistency: 39 of 40 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 annual filings from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 14/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.

Leadership & pay

33 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • ANN KURTH (PRESIDENT): $722,196 total reported compensation
  • ANDREA CHOI (SVP FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION): $383,952 total reported compensation
  • JILL CLARK CHIEF (DEVELOP. OFFICER THRU NOV 2024): $270,296 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024.